Key Difference Between Asterisk and OpenSIPS

  • Fri, 05/01/2015 - 02:41 by aatif

In the ever-evolving landscape of Voice over IP (VoIP) and Unified Communication systems, two names consistently stand out: Asterisk and OpenSIPS. Both are powerful, open-source solutions widely adopted by service providers, telecom companies, and enterprises. While they share the common goal of enabling real-time voice and video communication over IP networks, their roles, architecture, and capabilities differ significantly.

Introduction to Asterisk

Asterisk is a full-featured, open-source Private Branch Exchange (PBX) developed by Digium and maintained by the open-source community. It enables voice calls, video conferencing, IVR systems, voicemail, and more. Asterisk functions as a Back-to-Back User Agent (B2BUA), meaning it handles both the signaling and media paths during a call session, allowing it to control every aspect of the call flow.

Asterisk is known for its rich feature set, scalability, and flexibility in building complex telephony applications using Dialplan scripting and AGI (Asterisk Gateway Interface). Its ability to interface with traditional telephony hardware and integrate with SIP, IAX2, and other protocols makes it a versatile solution for small to large deployments.

Introduction to OpenSIPS

OpenSIPS (Open SIP Server) is a high-performance SIP proxy server that focuses solely on signaling. Unlike Asterisk, OpenSIPS is not responsible for handling media streams but excels in routing SIP traffic, enabling SIP registration, authentication, load balancing, NAT traversal, SIP trunking, and session control.

OpenSIPS is engineered for scalability and throughput, capable of handling thousands of concurrent SIP sessions with minimal CPU and memory usage. Its modular architecture allows it to act as a SIP Proxy, Registrar, Load Balancer, Application Server, or even a SIP Front-end for media servers like Asterisk, FreeSWITCH, or RTPengine.

ICT Innovations is open source based solution provider focused to provide creative business solutions to Internet Telephony Service Providers to find new ways to generate their revenue by offering innovative services. ICT Innovations has good working experience and uses following open source technologies / tools to meet clients requirements.

Architecture Comparison

  • Asterisk employs a Back-to-Back User Agent (B2BUA) architecture. It manages both signaling and media, making it suitable for features like IVR studio, voicemail, and conferencing. It performs codec and protocol translation internally and offers fine-grained call control.

  • OpenSIPS, on the other hand, follows a stateless or stateful SIP Proxy architecture. It strictly manages signaling and relies on external media servers for audio and video handling. This makes it faster and more lightweight than Asterisk when used purely for call routing or session management.

Connectivity to PSTN

  • Asterisk supports direct connectivity with the PSTN through telephony interface cards using DAHDI drivers. It can also work with SIP or IAX trunks for VoIP-to-PSTN bridging.

  • OpenSIPS does not support hardware telephony interfaces. It requires an external SIP gateway or media server to interact with the PSTN, making it a better fit in fully IP-based environments or in hybrid deployments with Asterisk handling PSTN termination.

Load Balancing and High Availability

  • Asterisk offers basic load balancing using custom dialplans and external tools. Failover can be achieved through SIP routing and logic built into applications.

  • OpenSIPS excels in load balancing using powerful hashing algorithms and dynamic dispatcher modules. It can intelligently route calls based on user credentials, URIs, or call IDs. Its advanced failover mechanisms make it ideal for building robust and scalable VoIP clusters.

Protocol and Header Access

  • Asterisk allows low-level control over SIP and IAX protocols. However, its capabilities are limited when dealing with custom SIP header manipulation or SIP version translations.

  • OpenSIPS provides deep protocol-level access. Developers can manipulate SIP headers, create custom routing logic, and even translate between incompatible SIP versions, making it a powerful signaling engine for complex telecom infrastructures.

Media Handling and Advanced Services

  • Asterisk includes native support for media services such as:

    • Interactive Voice Response (IVR)

    • Voicemail

    • Text-to-Speech (TTS)

    • Automatic Speech Recognition (ASR)

    • Conferencing and call recording

  • OpenSIPS does not handle media directly. It is commonly integrated with media servers like Asterisk, FreeSWITCH, or RTPengine to enable media-related functionalities.

Use Cases in Modern VoIP and AI-Powered Communication Systems

  • Asterisk is ideal for:

    • Call centers with IVR and agent routing

    • Voicemail, TTS, and ASR applications

    • On-premises PBX deployments

    • AI-powered voicebot integration using AGI or ARI

  • OpenSIPS is preferred for:

    • High-volume SIP routing

    • Carrier-grade VoIP infrastructure

    • SIP trunking and load balancing

    • Acting as a SIP front-end for AI voice assistants and machine learning models in real-time routing

Conclusion

While both Asterisk and OpenSIPS are foundational tools in the VoIP ecosystem, their roles are distinct and often complementary. Asterisk shines in managing media and application logic, while OpenSIPS is unparalleled in high-performance SIP signaling and scalability.

In modern deployments—especially those embracing AI-driven communication, cloud-based VoIP infrastructure, and microservices architectures—the combination of OpenSIPS for SIP signaling and Asterisk or other media servers for handling calls offers an agile and scalable solution for next-gen communication platforms.